I'm a Kodi user. I'm starting to feel dirty.
Kodi is being
tarnished. Eteknix today reported on an 'epidemic' that's becoming the 'scourge of the
audiovisual industry'. In that article, a spokesperson for the UK
governments intellectual property office is quoted as saying;
'We are aware that set-top boxes, while perfectly legal in their own right, are frequently adapted by criminals to illegally receive TV channels protected by intellectual property rights'
These boxes are
everywhere. My facebook feed is filled with sponsored posts promoting
their merits. Even Amazon has a slew of 'fully loaded' android boxes
at ridiculous prices.
How would you feel
about having all the best channels available at only a fraction of
the cost of traditional subscription packages?
Would you be interested
in having access to every 3pm premier league game on a Saturday in
full HD? Or perhaps over 2,700 movies on demand with over 280 boxsets
just waiting to be watched.
With <name redacted>
we provide all this along with a reliable system (PLEX) which is all
hosted on one server so you never need to worry about unreliable
links. All you need to do is sit back, click, watch and enjoy.
I probed this a little.
It's a Roku box with a Plex install calling home to a private Plex
server which serves up re-encoded TV streams and media files. For
€145 you get the box and a 'years subscription'. €100 per year
thereafter.
Boxes to date often
suffer from gradual degradation as the plug-ins fail or fail to be
maintained etc. This is different. It's very Apple-like in that it
ties up the hardware, software and content in one closed loop.
Clever. And dangerous.
These things are flying
out the door, apparently.
Where I live, I see a
growing entitlement culture and a sometimes violent reluctance to
contribute fairly to public services. This attitude fosters a ripe
breeding ground for these kinds of products. 'Why should I pay
hundreds per year a subscription service when I get this for
pennies?'.
Why indeed.
I wonder how these
re-encoded streams look on the new 4K displays that have been
purchased on the strength of the savings made? Poor, I'd guess.
Result? A growing idea
that the newer TV standards are rubbish and a scam resulting is less
mass market appeal and higher prices for the rest of us.
And that's not even
considering the logical conclusion. If everyone migrates from
subscription services to the illicit box model, who will pay for new
content? And that's across the board from Netflix to Hollywood via
Sky and HBO.
It's blinkered
behaviour but money talks and it will continue for as long as it's
available.
What can be done?
Well, moves are afoot to address the box resellers legally. A cut-price TV store in Middlesborough is in court for selling Kodi boxes. But that's a drop in the ocean.
The real solution
likely lies with the software vendors. Indeed, Kodi and Plex can
rightly argue that they just build the tools and are not responsible
for what users do with them. Should Microsoft be held to account
because people can use their OS and browser to find torrents?
But it's reputational
at this stage.
I use Kodi to power my
whole-house a/v system. It's on every TV and it provides a unified
front end for my Live TV and PVR (TvHeadEnd), music files (ripped
from my CDs) and movies (ripped from my DVDs and BluRays).
I've been through a lot
of systems including SageTV, Plex, MediaPortal and others and Kodi is
the one that best matches my needs . It's been rock-solid for me for
over two years now.
However, if I was
evaluating now, would I even consider it? With all the noise around
illegal boxes etc, my perception would probably be that it's just a
front end for dodgy streams and will probably be unreliable.
The best solution I see
is for Kodi and Plex to step up and limit the extensions and use
cases that permit wholesale piracy and nefarious content
distribution. Force plug-ins to be vetted. Adopt the Apple model and
make sure we've got high quality content still available to us down
the road.
No comments:
Post a Comment